My Photo
Follow UselessTree on Twitter

Zhongwen

Nedstat



  • eXTReMe Tracker
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 07/2005

« Pieces of Tao | Main | Panlong is Dongzhou »

January 16, 2006

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

There is a strong materialism in modern China, but is this really far from the ancient ways? People seek to benefit their descendants and reflect back honor upon their ancestors in their own way.
True, it is sad to see so little attention paid to the Classics. But for millenia very few people could read the ancient books. There are perhaps more now, rather than less, who are literate and interested. Before there were many who studied just to get positions and make money. Now those who study the 13 books do it for love of righteousness.

I guess what I am trying to say is that cultural fads are fleeting, but people change slowly. The city changes, but the Well remains the same.

China has had many long, hungry years. It is understandable that many young people are sating themselves on the 'fat, glistening meat' of western culture, as shown in gua 3.5 which I received about this article.

Regards,
Unworthy Hermit Taras

Taras,
Yes, Chinese life has long had (always had?) a powerful materialist aspect to it. My point is to suggest that Confucius and Taoists push against this materialism. Thus, to the extent that materialism has always defined Chinese life, I think we can then question the extent to which Confucianism or Taoism define, in some essential manner, Chinese society. These systems of thought are, basically, oppositional in both political and economic terms. And the kinds of materialist excesses seen in modern China (and most other places) are certainly not what either school of thought would accept as a "good life."

Sam,

Perhaps it comes down to a differentiation of terms. For instance the Daoism many of us in the West learned from the translations of Legge, Giles, Wilhelm, etc. differs widely from both many Chinese people's perceptions and from the historic Daoism that is beginning to be revealed from material coming 'back from the grave' through archaeology.

So too with Confucianism. Does the term mean what we read in the Lun Yu and the Spring and Autumn Annals? Or the Song Dynasty writings? Were the Qing rulers Confucianist? I think it is too wide a term, and thus loses some degree of meaning.

The situation is in transition and the superior minds of China are watching and waiting.

This is described in Gua 13.3:

"Conceal your weapons in the high grass.
Climb the barrow.
Wait three years."

No one wants to reveal their hand and be shipped off like their fathers, uncles and aunts to the camps and farms for carelessly being free with their words too early.

The three religions are certainly a counterfoil to excesses in politics and society, but they are only effective in an age where they can take root. Master Kong himself did not live in such an age, to his great sorrow.

Taras

The comments to this entry are closed.

Aidan's Way

  • :


    Understanding disability from a Taoist point of view

Globalpost